Islam

Moral and cultural cowardice

The Christmas and New Year period 2015-16 was marked in Europe by rampaging Muslim males sexually assaulting numerous women in Cologne, Germany.  They burnt Christmas trees in Belgium and violently assaulted people in an Oslo suburb.  The last one is nothing new.  Muslims have declared no-go zones across western Europe and regularly assault people who do not respect their sharia in those areas.  Don’t forget the British soldier with his head hacked off in England or the mass killings last year in France and the USA.

Where are all the westerners out protesting against all of this.  They protest the G8, climate change, the TPP and anything to do with the ‘infringement’ of homosexual ‘rights’, but remain silent on terrible atrocities.  Even when Muslims rampage through Paris and San Bernardino all we see are candle light vigils.

The fact is the western world has so wrapped itself in self-loathing and liberal multicultural newthink that it has lost its moral compass.  We have been told it is politically incorrect (verboten) to speak ill of another culture, even if it is a theocratically Islamic and contradicts all the West used to stand for.  Westerners have become cringing moral cowards.  So, lets put the record straight with a few home truths:

Western civilisation reached the pinnacle of human achievement in just about every area of human progress.  We in the West may have some blotches on our record, but they shrink to the size of pinheads when arrayed against the vaunting successes in science, medicine, agriculture, human freedoms and the institutions of good government and justice.  There is no other culture to match it in the past or the present and no better culture waits in the wings.  In fact it is quite the reverse.

Islam is a pervasive death cult and a cultural system that reduces all those who are enslaved in it to a mediocre existence.  It has no redeeming features and will, if allowed to go unchallenged, become progressively more violent.  What’s worse the evidence for the veracity of its very teachings is missing. One point six billion people are living under a religious system that only exists because a 7th century murderous maniac claimed he had heard from God.  There are no lines of evidence that comport to verify his claims.

The West is set on a course, under the liberal elite dominating politics, corporations, academia and the media, that must inevitably lead to either moral and cultural capitulation to the Mullahs of oppression and death, or a bloody fight back to reclaim Western civilisation’s values and right to survive.  The longer we leave it the more certain we can be that death and violence will escalate.  We can’t run and there is no-where to hide

The Israelites fell under God’s judgment and lost their martial strength because they invited foreigners with false God’s in and made alliances with the nations that worshipped these Gods.  The Israelites lost their cultural compass and they defied the laws of God to do it.  The West is doing much the same today.

ISIS Paris attacks and political hypocrisy

The usual denial of the Islamic origins of jihad terror, has followed the Paris  and San Bernardino attacks.  The attacks are put down to Muslim extremism, when it is in fact Islamic orthodoxy. The jihad terrorists are no more extreme than the example set by their beloved prophet Mohammad and their venerated Allah.  They are simply doing what their religion tells them is their supreme and central purpose, to bring the world into submission to Allah – by any means.  Anyone who has looked into Islamic history will know it has always been spread and maintained by the sword, atrocity and by fear.

President Obama has led the gaggle of delusional western leaders in parroting the patently absurd claim that Islam is a religion of peace, when it is clear to everyone, not driven by the liberal multicultural agenda that it is not.

From a Christian perspective it is especially galling that President Obama will at every opportunity dredge up events from Christianity’s past to claim all religions have their extremists. He conveniently ignores the fact that where evil was done in the name of Christianity it happened in opposition to biblical instruction.  Islam, on the other hand can draw directly on its Koran and the example of its prophet to justify violent inhumanity. He also completely ignores the fact that Islam is drenched in the blood of those it slew over centuries in repeated Jihad-ist wars.  This sort of rank hypocrisy is reprehensible.

Western leaders have been busy denying and marginalising Christianity for decades, simply because it is opposed to their liberal, multicultural ideology.  When it comes to Islam they are willing to paper over the truth, deny their own claims to tolerance, reason and gender equality and ignore the very foundations of Islam.  More hypocrisy.  They have therefore become its apologists and are complicit in its Jihads.  The Bible tells us people like to say good is evil and evil is good.  There is no better example of this truth today than the defence of Islam by Obama, Merkel, Cameron and their fellow travelers in the EU and U.S. government.

ISIS is Islam

Here are two letters written by two Christians intent on informing politicians and the general public about the realities behind the Islamic threat. Their latter’s ignorance about Islam is truly astounding. A Princeton Islamic scholar, Bernard Haykel, has recently ‘come out’ by acknowledging the jihadists in ISIS and other Islamic terror groups are acting in accord with the teachings of the Koran and the example set by their prophet, Mohammad. This will be a revelation to many who listen to silly rhetoric claiming the terrorists are not properly following their religion. They are, it is just that most Muslims don’t want to go around killing people. They don’t really understand their faith, preferring to sideline the teachings that tell them Islam is all about bringing the whole world into submission to their Allah – by persuasion or violence. They can’t live up to the full demands of their faith because they just want to live peaceful lives. It does not take much to radicalise elements within the Islamic world because, being zealous for their faith and because they want assurance of salvation they turn easily to violence when incited to do so. This is not about cultural differences and the need to ‘understand each other’. This is spiritual. Islam is, at its heart, a vicious theocratic world view and has demonstrated its thirst for violence ever since its inception.
Here are the letters. A quick note concerning the context for each precedes them:

 

Letter One: Sent to New Zealand politicians in response to their concerns over sending a small training team to Iraq to help prepare Iraqi troops in their fight against ISIS.

I am writing to you and other MP’s to say some things that seem to have been left out of the debate on the Islamic issue. I’ve been into Muslim no go zones in the UK, faced off against Islamists in London and been into Islamic countries:

1. When NZ faced the Nazi threat, along with its allies, it saw not just an ‘existential threat’, but genuine evil. Now when confronted with the manifest evil in ISIS and the existential threat posed by the possible emergence of an new caliphate, along side a possibly nuclear armed Iran, we prevaricate over sending a mere training unit. All I’m seeing here is self-serving weakness. Australia already has 600 troops in Iraq while we huff and puff. I was opposed to US action in Iraq but the wolves have now been let loose – like it or not

2. The constant statements that Islam is a religion of peace and the jihadists are an extremist aberration is nonsense. This is what their prophet said to his followers; “I was ordered to fight all men until they say ‘There is no god but Allah.’” (Stark, 2009, God’s Battalions) Islam reveres its prophet who ordered over 60 violent jihads and led close to 30 of them personally. The so called extremists are only obeying their prophet and their ‘holy’ book. In the Koran there are 100+ calls to violence and jihad on an unrelenting basis until all are submitted to Allah.

3. Most of the ‘violent’ verses (e.g. in Surah 9) are in later surahs which under Muslim rules of exegesis abrogate earlier verses. So the ‘peaceful verses’ are abrogated. Thus the peaceful Muslims are in fact simply nominal Muslims. Their desire to live peaceful lives has nothing to do with Islam. What the violent Muslims are doing today is entirely in accord with Islam and consistent with the great swath of Islamic history from the 7th Century to 1683 when they were stopped at the gates of Vienna (not for the first time).

Its time you MPs grew a spine, woke up and spoke up. There is much more at stake here than your precious parliamentary careers. You need to put NZ, civilisation and humanity first.
< signed >
Letter two: Sent to a prominent national New Zealand radio host ho went on to read it on air:

Congratulations on your interview re Islam…a rare ray of light among dark clouds of apparently intentional misinformation. ISIS conforms exactly to the central authorities of Islam: the Koran, the Hadiths, and the example of Mohammad himself as portrayed in Islamic literature. The Islamic understanding of these was locked in over a 1000 years ago and any deviation from this understanding is apostasy. ‘Reformers’ are killed.

Mohammad authorised lying – Taqiyya – to further the Islamic cause, thus the deceptive claims by Muslims that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’. By ‘peace’ is meant the final state they envisage when Islam controls the world. Until then there is bloody war with all opposition to Islam, following the example of Mohammad. Some peace. Western leaders who recite this mantra are water carriers for Islam.

Mohammad oversaw and personally participated in the beheading of 700-900 Jewish men in Medina on one day, who had surrendered to him in good faith…and dispersed their women as sex slaves to his followers. Thus the contemporary mass beheading of those who oppose Islam and the taking of captured women as sex slaves.

Mohammad married his favourite wife Aisha when she was 6 and consummated the marriage when she was 9 and he over 50. This is confirmed by several Hadiths attributed to Aisha herself. Thus the legitimisation of child marriage by Muslims. It must be legitimate because the Islamic ‘perfect man’ did this.

Such behaviour has gone on consistently for the 1400 years of Islamic history with an estimated 270,000,000 people dying as a result of Jihad during that time.

ISIS is the authentic historic face of orthodox Islam.
< signed >

Islamic extremism

This entry follows the recent Islamic attacks on a French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, Boko Haram’s mass killings in Nigeria and then the mass beheading of Egyptian Coptic Christians in Sudan…

On-going Islamic atrocities continue to be met by a steadfast refusal, on the part of western leaders, to link it directly to Islam.  It’s possible their insistence it represents an extremist betrayal of the fundamentally peaceful nature of Islam may only be a political and diplomatic device.  If they were to publicly acknowledge the obvious and decry Islam’s avowed intent to Islamify the world, by force and extreme violence whenever necessary (Surah 9:5, 29 for example), what would happen? They would confront the millions of usually nominal Muslim’s in the West with the fact that their religion does indeed call for violence against non-Muslims.  Its their duty -their salvation is at stake if they resist Allah’s will. They would then be presented with various choices: defy Koranic teaching by remaining Muslim, renounce their faith, or become actively jihadist.  The first option would create a great deal of internal angst and eventually force them into one of the other two options. The second choice would leave them exposed to sharia death penalty laws for renouncing the faith and the last choice would mean they would  have to start covertly working with jihadists in the West.

Western leaders will not see a good side to any of this.  All those millions of passive Muslims would start making choices and those choices would all spell social disruption, exposing the false nature of multiculuralism, long supported by these leaders and their political parties.  Its a Catch 22 situation entirely of their own making.  Ultimately, they are going to be forced into either capitulating to Islamic demands within the West, especially as the Muslim population is, by natural increase, growing rapidly.  If they do that they will risk civil wars as Europeans eventually revolt against laws and restrictions on rights which are anathema to western values.  Their other choice, to openly and honestly acknowledge the violence inherent in Islam, will also lead to serious social disruption for the reasons given.  Despite that it would be the correct path, simply because unless Islam is confronted and dealt to decisively it will continue its crusade to enslave us all.

Where should the Church be in all of this. It should certainly not be seeking common ground with Islam as it is at present.  It could, instead, be actively and vociferously  proclaiming the truth that Islam is violent to the bone, while calling on nominal Muslims to either change the laws on abrogation so that the early Koranic ‘peaceful verses’ are reinstated, or leave Islam. This of course is to provide some legitimacy for Islam as a religion, something Truth Watch could not support, therefore this option should not be followed.

The correct course is to boldly denounce Islam for the violent and oppressive religion it is and actively proselytise amongst Muslim communities at a level that would almost certainly promote a violent backlash – similar to the persecution early Christians experienced when they challenged the Roman world’s paganism.  Publicising Islam’s violent history would also be a good tactic.  It is long past time the West woke up to the fact that for the last 1400 years it has been at war, intermittently, with Islam. Islam has never been at peace with the West.  The latter’s dominance and the Islamic world’s own backward weakness has kept them quiet since the Muslim Caliphate was wound up following the First World War.

A third more moderate option would be to simply push for strict integration.  No more Muslim enclaves.  Muslims would need to under-go training in core western values and acknowledge their supremacy in the country they have chosen to adopt.  No more calls for Sharia Law.  Unfortunately, this option will run into liberal multicultural conditioning that will likely make such a policy weak and ineffective. Muslim resistance would almost certainly grow too and effete western liberalism is no match for militant Islam.  Attempts at stronger integration would probably fail and cause the internal divisions and violence it was supposed to prevent.

Thanks to western liberal multiculturalism and its associated immigration policies the West has created an enemy within.  For 1400 years we fought to keep them at arms length.  Now, in our ‘enlightened’ liberal era we have simply opened the gates and let them flood in. The ludicrous and unnecessary apology the Pope issued over the Crusades is now exposed. Why should the West apologise for fighting to hold the Muslim armies at bay in the Levant as they repeatedly attempted to topple the Byzantium flank to Europe.  If it had fallen in the Twelfth Century the West, in its fractured state, would have been hard pressed to resist the attack that would have inevitably come from both the east and the west (through Spain).

The Church is complicit in this sad state of affairs.  It has remained silent on Islamic immigration, which in OT terms would have been the equivalent of inviting the Philistines to occupy Israel.    The Church could have followed Israel’s example, since it clearly had God’s sanction.  Instead it defied biblical example and sought to find common cause with an implacable enemy.